|
About LPI:
Frequently asked questions
Table of Contents
-
1. General
-
2. Exams
-
3. Publicity
-
4. Training/Courseware
-
5. Organization
1. General
-
1.1. What is the purpose of the Linux Professional
Institute
-
As stated in our mission statement, this group
perceived the need for an accepted certification process which will recognize
and certify the talent and hard work of Linux users everywhere in the world.
Once begun, the effort has taken on a life of it's own and has now involved
some of the Linux movement's best and brightest in a fully open process
aimed at providing certification to all.
-
1.2. Why is a certification program needed for
Linux?
-
There are a number of very good reasons for doing so, most of which have
been listed by Dan York in the inaugural
article for his certification series he's been doing for the Linux
Gazette. For brevity's sake here's a list of his bullet points (but
please consult his article for a more thorough discussion):
-
Create industry recognition
-
Provide an organizational path for students
-
Provide an organizational mechanism for training centers
-
Enhance marketing
-
Counter the "no-support" argument
-
Turn students into advocates
-
Provide other means of employment for Linux skilled individuals
-
Recruit new Linux users
-
Assist in the hiring process
The easiest way to gain corporate, governmental, and institutional support
and usage of Linux is to ensure that there is a bonified support mechanism
in place... most of the major stakeholder companies within the Linux community
have either put one in place or are in the process of doing so. The
next step is to provide a path for Linux professionals to follow so that
they will be employable within this framework. In short... it's all
about support!
-
1.3. What can I do to help?
-
There are many ways in which you can help with the activitities
of LPI. Here's a short list:
-
Write test questions - Through our TIPS
interface we are collecting test questions submitted by people across the
Internet for use on our exams.
-
Comment on our objectives - First view our objectives
and then visit POMS -
where we're soliciting public comments and discussion about the test objectives.
If you want more information on where LPI is going please read our Initial
Development Plan.
-
Volunteer at booths- we are talking about LPI at an increasing number
of trade shows and are always in need of more volunteers. Contact Jared
Buckley if you can help.
-
Help find financial sponsors - an effort like this involves a lot
of money and we're always seeking people to join our list of sponsors.
Visit our sponsorship page to learn more.
-
Write, speak or otherwise help in publicity - we always need more
people to write about LPI and speak at conferences and events. Contact
Evan
Leibovitch or Dan York if you are
interested.
-
Join and participate in our mailing lists - visit our page
on getting involvedfor more information about how to join the lists.
There are many more ways to become involved. Watch the news on our home
page and join in our mailing lists to learn more.
-
1.4. When do you expect to complete your work?
-
Developing a certification program will be a continual process and so in
some ways our work will never be done. It's our intention to maintain the
certification process in keeping with the needs and traditions of the Linux
community, as well as any changes in the technologies we will be testing.
Our first exam (101/T1a) was deployed in January 2000 and 102/T1b will
be deployed in the first quarter of 2000. Development of the Level 2 and
Level 3 exams will occur over the first half of the year 2000.
-
1.5. I've worked with a lot of "certified" people
and haven't been impressed with their competence. What do you say
to this type of criticism?
-
First of all LPI does not believe that certification is a blanket solution
for Linux (or any other operating system for that matter). In our
considered opinion there is no substitute for experience! That
said, people do have to start somewhere and that is the biggest fallacy
in the overall perception of certificate programs... because there is a
general, industry wide shortfall of qualified people working in the IT
field it's possible for a fresh faced certificate holder too be put
at the head of the line too early (there's nothing wrong with hiring them...
in fact employers are going to hire LPI cert holders in droves... but employers
have to be aware of the difference between a cert holder or non-cert holder
with 5 years of experience with Linux and a cert holder with 6 months of
experience with Linux). Depending on the talents of the individuals
that difference could be huge but that is not generally a shortfall of
the certificate program itself, in our opinion it is more correctly a failed
hiring practice and does not reflect accurately on the certificate program.
LPI believes that, as in all things, people's individual talent, skill
and work ethic will make or break them in the IT field. Please remember,
LPI is not trying to create a "first among equals" type of solution as
we really do not believe that such a thing exists. The LPI certifications
will provide potential employers with a standard gauge to measure the technical
quality and competence of a given candidate and that's all a certification
can do. The rest is up to the candidate and that's the way it should
be.
-
1.6. How will the LPI program meet the requirements
of existing hiring practices and local regulations (such as U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity laws)?
-
LPI intends to provide hiring managers and contractors a gauge to help
assess Linux related skill levels of individuals. To that end, LPI has
attracted and assembled a diverse and talented group of people from the
world-wide Linux community to help create the program. Very few of these
people have ever met face to face, as the entire effort is being conducted
in a virtual setting on the Internet. The diversity of this group
will help us ensure that our program is free of gender, racial, or cultural
bias. In fact, since most, if not all, of the individuals working
on LPI's programs have never met in person they'd be hard pressed to identify
much more than the gender of a co-worker and in many cases not that either.
Additionally, LPI will work to validate our program against the psychometric
standards required by regulations in the US and other countries as applicable.
Furthermore we will publish results of our validation studies on the LPI
site.
-
1.7. These exams seem geared toward system administrators.
Will you also be providing certification for developers?
-
The LPI program is currently targeted at system and network administrators,
as our research found that this was the area that needed the most growth
of support professionals. We have no current plan to provide developer
certification, however we could consider such a program if it is something
the Linux community and the larger market deem necessary at some future
point.
-
1.8. I am confused about Red Hat's connection
to LPI. Don't they have a competing certification?
-
Yes, they do have their own certification program. When Red Hat started
to develop their Red Hat Certified Engineer (RHCE) program, there were
no other existing Linux certification programs and LPI did not yet exist.
Now with LPI's emergence, Red Hat is participating in LPI's Advisory Council
and staying in touch with what is happening. They are continuing development
of their own program and are watching the evolution of LPI to see if or
how the programs may or may not complement each other.
-
1.9. How does LPI compare to other Linux certification
programs?
-
Since there is no central authority for the Linux operating system, anyone
can, in fact, start up a Linux certification program and several companies
have. As mentioned previously, Red Hat has their program which focuses
exclusively on their distribution. A small company called SAIR has also
created a program based on their own criteria they developed. A company
called Tekmetrics offers a web-based certification. Two other companies
DigitalMetrics
and ProsoftTraining.com developed
their own programs as well but have either now merged their efforts into
LPI or are in the process of doing so. The major difference of LPI from
all of these programs is that we are a completely vendor-neutral, distribution-neutral,
non-profit organization that evolved out of the Linux community and focuses
solely on setting certification standards. There are other differences
in approach, support and research - if you are interested in more information,
feel free to send questions to dan@lpi.org.
In truth, we welcome all of these programs because in the end they
will all help grow the pool of Linux support professionals and help with
the corporate adoption of Linux!
-
1.10. How does LPI's certification relate to
the general UNIX system administration certification being developed by
SAGE?
-
For some time now, the System Administrators
Guilde (SAGE), a special technical group of USENIX
has been working on a more general certification program for UNIX system
administrators. That program is still under development and we are continuing
to stay in touch with SAGE so that hopefully the two programs can complement
each other as they move forward. Dan York was added to the SAGE certification
committee specifically to act as a liaison between the two organizations.
-
1.11. How do LPI levels correlate to the SAGE
job descriptions for UNIX sys admins?
-
The System Administrator's Guild(SAGE)
has developed a series of job descriptions that outline the skills a person
should have to work at different levels of system administration within
an organization. While there is no direct correlation to the SAGE job descriptions,
they were one of the many sources consulted while we were in the early
design stages of the LPI program.
-
1.12. I am actually interested in hardware
certification - is there another project addressing that?
-
Yes. You are looking for the Open Hardware Certifiation Program. Their
web site is www.open-hardware.org.
Henry Hall is the coordinator of that project.
-
1.13. I was previously certified with DigitalMetrics.
What do I do to become LPI certified?
-
After our merger with DigitalMetrics, we agreed that candidates who had
successfully attained the DigitalMetrics Certified Linux Administrator
(dmCLA) credential would not have to take all three exams for LPI Level
One. Instead, the following will occur:
-
All dmCLAs will receive credit for exam 101.
-
All dmCLAs will need to pass 102.
We felt this was the most appropriate way to acknowledge the work that
people put into attaining the dmCLA certification. If you have further
questions about this, please contact us at info@lpi.org.
2. Exams
-
2.1. How much will LPI exams cost?
-
Our intention is to provide testing at the lowest possible costs. Most
of our exams will cost $100 US, and some may cost less.
-
2.2. How many tests will it take to be certified?
-
The answer depends on how many levels of LPI certification you wish to
pursue. There are currently 2 exams for the first level, 2 exams for the
second, and 2 for the third. Visit our program description
for more information.
-
2.3. Where can I take the exams?
-
Our exams will be offered through the test centers of Virtual
University Enterprises(VUE). Visit their web page to find a test center
near you.
-
2.4. How can I offer the exams to my students/clients?
-
You will need to become a VUE
testing center - or work with a VUE testing center near you. Local
testing centers can offer tests at your facility.
-
2.5. There is no VUE testing centers near me. What
can I do?
-
Our best suggestion is to contact your nearest VUE
testing center. Testing centers can administer exams onsite, so
if a testing center is able to bring their equipment to you, you might
be able to work something out. If there is a group of people in your area
interested in getting certified, you might be able to get the testing center
to schedule a day of exams for you. You can also approach local companies
- typically computer training or services companies - and encourage them
to become a VUE test center.
-
2.6. Why aren't you offering exams across the web?
-
We would have liked to offer exams through the web, but until you can get
around the fact that someone else could take the exam for you - or be right
with you as you take the exam - there's really no way to securely offer
the test online.
-
2.7. Do all LPI exams use computer-based testing?
-
In order to be global and to be able to include the largest number of people,
LPI is deploying Levels 1-3 using computer-based testing through VUE. We
have not ruled out someday having a Level 4 that might include some different
type of examination method, but that is something that will have to be
evaluated at some later date.
-
2.8. Why are you not using Sylvan Prometric testing
centers?
-
Within the world of computer-based testing, there are really two major
test delivery vendors, Sylvan Prometric
and VUE. They both deliver the same exams
for other cert programs (such as Microsoft) with a difference being that
Sylvan has something like 2,100 test sites and VUE has 2,200 test sites.
For a number of competitive reasons, we chose to deploy first with VUE.
We have not ruled out eventually deploying with both Sylvan and
VUE, but are going with VUE first.
-
2.9. How is your certification process going to
include the version specific aspects of Linux, like the different "stock"
scripts used with Red Hat as opposed to Debian?
-
Distribution differences has been a hot topic of discussion for us. For
quite some time, we maintained a series of distribution-specific exams
(what we called our "T2" exams). However, we have now changed this requirement
and are no longer requiring the T2 exams. Much of the differences that
we were planning to test on are no longer either valid or able to be tested
on.
-
2.10. What about the testing obstacles presented
to individuals for whom English is not their native tongue?
-
LPI feels that we have to walk before we can run so this issue will be
deferred until we have the English versions released. After that, we will
explore translation of exams into other languages, providing that for a
given language we can determine that there definitely is a need and also
providing that we can obtain financial backing for the translation. We
have already seen interest in both a German and Japanese version and will
begin working on those once the English exams are underway.
-
2.11. (Feb 2000) I took the test during the "beta"
period and did not receive my score. When I check on the VUE web site,
it says I failed. What is going on?
-
Due to an unforeseen problem with the data feed from one of our vendors,
the VUE exam results web page is incorrectly reporting that everyone who's
completed the T1a exam has failed. This is NOT correct. We're working with
VUE and our other partners to remedy this situation for future releases
of the test, and the problem should go away once T1a is out of it's "beta"
period. Rest assured, the initial exams for T1a are being evaluated at
LPI by hand to assure their psychometric validity and when the results
are in you'll receive notification via good old- fashioned snail mail.
Until T1a goes out of it's "beta" period you can safely ignore this message.
VUE has modified the web page to notify customers of the problem until
LPI can find a solution with our supplier.
-
2.12. Why does this beta phase take so long?
-
Validating the tests is part of our quality assurance procedure: we test
the exams in practice. Several steps need to be made, which take
time:
-
Many people (about 300) need to take the test so we can collect statistics.
-
After we have sufficient data, we need some time to analyse them, determine
for each question how well it contributes, possibly improve or replace
some, assign weight to the test items, and determine the cut score (the
minimum number of points a candidate needs to collect at the test).
-
Then a complete version of the test, including weights, is prepared and
processed before it becomes available through VUE.
-
The tests taken during the beta period then need to be hand-scored, and
the results are mailed.
-
People who take the test during the final stages, after we stopped collecting
data but before the final test is published, have to wait until after the
final test becomes available: we then score their answres manually, and
mail the results.
-
2.13. There are many questions about obscure options
for commands. Why are we supposed to know them? I am an experienced
sysadmin, and I still consult the man pages!
-
Although we try to avoid test items like that, they are useful. First,
nobody is expected to answer all test items correctly (in fact, in the
beta period, nobody did).
-
The goal of the test is to identify competent, experienced people
from among unqualified people. Experienced people tend to know more
of these options than inexperienced people: for example, experienced might
answer 50% correctly, versus versus 10% by novices. So even these
items help identifying the right people.
-
Moreover, in the beta phase of our test we investigate the quality
of our test items. If nobody answers the item correctly (or if everybody
does), the item is useless and is removed. All test items in our
exams have proven to be useful in making the distinction between novices
and experts.
-
2.14. Questions about test scores:
-
How are the test scores computed?
-
What percentage of the questions do I need to answer correctly to pass
the test?
-
How good is my score of ...?
-
We do not just count the items the candidate answers correctly. Instead,
based on the results of the beta phase, we assign a weight to each item,
and sum those which were answered correctly: this yields the score of the
candidate. These scores are scaled such that on average people score
500 points, within a range of 200 to 800 (technically, the results from
the sample of people who took the beta tests are normalized such that their
scores have a mean of 500, and a standard deviation of 100 points).
We then determine a cut score to make a fair and optimal separation between
competent people who should pass, and novices who should fail. The
cut scores are:
-
| Test |
Form |
# items |
cut score |
| 101 |
A |
|
|
| 101 |
B |
|
|
| 102 |
A |
|
|
| 102 |
B |
|
|
-
-
2.15. So how good are your tests?
-
These are the statistics:
| Test |
Form |
alfa |
False- |
False+ |
| 101 |
A |
|
|
|
| 101 |
B |
|
|
|
| 102 |
A |
|
|
|
| 102 |
B |
|
|
|
-
-
Cronbach's alfa is a measure of consistency of the test: there will
be a range of scores that people obtain; the alfa is the fraction of this
total variance that can be explained by a single trait that people have
to a different amount. This unique trait is the skill that the test
is designed to measure. The number ranges from 0 to 1, and higher
is better.
-
False- is the estimated percentage of people that are competent
but fail the test;
-
False+ is the estimated percentage of people that are unqualified
but pass the test anyway. These numbers result from the standard
deviation in the score results mentioned above, and the cut score we set.
-
These statistics are not usually published for certification tests,
so we can not compare our results with other existing programs, but from
case studies in psychometrics we know that results like these are common
and quite acceptable.
-
2.16. Aren't hands-on certification tests (like
Red Hat's) better than paper multiple choice tests like LPI is using?
-
The short answer is: No. For a detailed answer, check this
page.
3. Publicity
-
3.1. Who is the point of contact for publicity?
-
Inquiries should be directed either to Dan York (dan@lpi.org
or mobile phone +1-603-264-0129) or Evan Leibovitch (evan@lpi.org).
-
3.2. I'd like to do a presentation about LPI.
Do you have any sample presentations that I can use?
-
Yes, we have several presentations that we have created for various trade
shows. Those presentations will soon be available through our web site.
In the meantime, please contact Dan York
to obtain a copy.
-
3.3. Do you have a fact sheet about LPI that
I can include in a press kit?
-
Yes, we have a one-page fact sheet that is on our Press.
Please contact Dan York in the meantime.
Also, we would appreciate it if you would also just drop a note to Evan
Leibovitch letting him know in what publicity you will be including
our material.
-
3.4. Can I use the LPI logo on a brochure/flyer/document?
-
Not without prior explicit permission to do so. The LPI logo is in the
process of being trademarked and we cannot allow its use without our permission
for a number of reasons including the fact that we do not want it to be
seen as endorsing a product or service without our knowledge. Vendor-neutrality
is
critical for us! Please contact Evan Leibovitch (evan@lpi.org)
if you are interested in using the logo.
-
3.5. Can I put the logo - or a version of the
logo - on my web site to show our support for LPI?
-
We will soon be providing a logo that can be used for this purpose. If
you'd like to help with the design of this logo, please send a note to
Evan.
-
3.6. Can I help with the web site?
-
Yes, we have a team of people working on new versions of the web site and
on keeping the web site up to date. Please contact Chuck
Mead or Evan Leibovitch for more
information.
4. Training/Courseware
-
4.1. How do I prepare for LPI exams?
-
LPI specifies only the standards for certification and does not specify
at all how you prepare for certification. You can simply look at the objectives
and study on your own, read books or take training classes. Many members
of our Advisory Council are producing exam preparation
books or training materials and classes (online and instructor-led).
-
4.2. Where can I find a training
center that offers courses for LPI certification?
-
LPI itself does not provide any form of training, but several members of
our Advisory Council do. We also suggest you visit
http://www.lintraining.com/
to find other training centers and courseware vendors offering Linux training.
-
4.3. What will it take for my organization
to teach students so that they can become LPI certified?
-
Basically, you just need to find a source for courseware and start teaching!
You do not need the approval of LPI at all. You can either obtain courseware
from a vendor, or write your own by looking at the exam
objectives posted on the website. LPI does not specify any certain
courseware or teaching materials and leaves the creation of those materials
entirely to third parties. Several members of our Advisory
Council are providing courseware and you can also find courseware providers
at www.lintraining.com.
-
4.4. Will LPI be "approving" courseware?
-
This has been a common question for LPI as our work has progressed.
The short answer is yes, we are willing to provide this service.
The long answer is that we are very busy right now turning out our first
exams so it may be a little while before we're ready to offer this service.
We also recognize that there must be a program in place, quite soon, which
spells out how this will be accomplished. This is being worked on
right now but it's no where near ready for public scrutiny yet. Suggestions
and questions about this issue may be directed to Chuck
Mead, LPI Director of Corporate Relations.
-
4.5. Will LPI be certifying instructors?
-
Again, LPI is setting standards only for certification, not for
the education that prepares someone for certification exams. As
part of that, LPI leaves it entirely to other entities to develop courseware
and instruct classes. Those organizations may want to "certify" or "authorize"
instructors to teach that organization's courseware, but if they do, that
is something LPI leaves entirely up to the vendor to determine. As a result,
some courseware vendors may "certify" instructors and others may not. That
is their decision to make.
5. Organization
-
5.1. How long has LPI been organized?
-
LPI began through a series of discussion lists in the fall of 1998. The
organizational structure was proposed and established in January 1999 with
a Steering Committee overseeing operations from that time on. After much
legal work, LPI received its formal incorporation papers as a nonprofit
corporation on October 25, 1999.
-
5.2. Why is LPI incorporated in New Brunswick,
Canada?
-
Legal research found that there were only a few places in North America
where an organization could be incorporated and would not be required
to hold a face-to-face annual meeting of the Board of Directors. This was
an option we wanted because as the organization grows, we expect that Directors
may be located throughout the world, and, while face-to-face meetings are
desirable, we did not want to require future Boards to face this expense.
This factor, plus some Canadian laws making it difficult to file trivial
lawsuits, prompted our decision to incorporate in New Brunswick.
-
5.3. Can I see LPI's by-laws and other legal
documents?
-
Yes, our corporate By-Laws are now online on our web site.
-
5.4. How is LPI governed?
-
If you consult our by-laws you will see that
LPI is governed by a Board of Directors, consisting of volunteers who have
been very active in LPI since its earliest stages. That Board
is assisted by our Advisory Council which recommends
actions to the Board.
-
5.5. How is LPI funded?
-
In its initial stages, LPI has been funded through the generous contributions
of corporate and individual sponsors. Ongoing
funding of LPI will occur through sponsorships as well as a small portion
of the fee paid by exam candidates. If you are interested in becoming a
sponsor, please read our sponsorship program
overview and contact either Dan York (dan@lpi.org)
or Chuck Mead (chuck@lpi.org).
-
5.6. Is my sponsorship of LPI tax-deductible
in the United States?
-
No, not as a tax-exempt "charity" donation. LPI is incorporated as a nonprofit
organization, but has not yet undertaken the very involved and lengthy
process to qualify as a tax-exempt nonprofit organization within the U.S.(often
referred to using the IRS name of a "501(c)(3)"). Due to the length of
this process and our need to focus on delivering our exams, we do not anticipate
pursuing this status anytime soon. Your sponsorship may, however, be deductible
as some form of a business expense. Please check with an accountant for
more information.
-
5.7. I live outside of the United States.
How can I help LPI grow within my country?
-
We are evaluating different possible methods of helping LPI organize within
other countries. If you are interested in helping LPI grow within your
country, please contact Dan York for more
information.
Copyright© 1999-2000 Linux Professional
Institute Inc., All Rights Reserved
license termscontact
us
Modification $Date: 2001/01/12 19:19:48 $ |